Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Strohfus v. Bowers et al
as 4:2013cv04067
Plaintiff:
Toby Joseph Strohfus
Defendant:
Heather Bowers, Douglas Weber, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Dooley et al
as 5:2013cv05039
Petitioner:
Wade Elliot Bowles
Respondent:
Warden Dooley, Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Hughes County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2013cv03012
Plaintiff:
Thomas Morgan
Defendant:
Hughes County Sheriffs Office and Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scheetz v. Weber et al
as 4:2013cv04011
Petitioner:
Daryl T. Scheetz
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lohnes v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04196
Petitioner:
Burton Lohnes
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04191
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roy Chambers
Defendant:
Warden Douglas Weber and E.R. Regier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Running Bird v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04187
Petitioner:
Harold Running Bird
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong et al v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04145
Plaintiff:
Gregory Armstrong, Tracy Armstrong and R. A.
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Dennis Kaemingk, Daryl Slykhuis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhm v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04117
Petitioner:
Thomas Muhm
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04103
Petitioner:
Bruce Edgar Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
