Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ward v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00837
Petitioner:
James Ward
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morrison v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00665
Petitioner:
Robert L Morrison
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leon-Ganel v. Terrell et al
as 0:2008cv00544
Petitioner:
Sergio Leon-Ganel
Respondent:
Duke Terrell and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Slupkowski v. United States of America et al
as 0:2008cv00458
Petitioner:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Respondent:
United States of America and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00197
Petitioner:
Charles A. Brown
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Villegas v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00176
Petitioner:
Victor Villegas
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Mildner et al
as 0:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Mildner, Kori Theissen, Mark Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. US Parole Commission et al
as 0:2007cv04910
Petitioner:
Albert Johnson
Respondent:
US Parole Commission, Duke Terrell and US of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butler v. Terrell
as 0:2007cv04807
Petitioner:
James A. Butler
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Akbar v. Terrell
as 0:2007cv04530
Petitioner:
Muhammad J.D. Akbar
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
