Cases 11 - 20 of 67
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv02785
Defendant:
US Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Holder Jr.
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Perez
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Holder
as 1:2014cv00668
Petitioner:
Guillermo Perez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Toolasprashad v. Holder, et al
as 1:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
Latchmie Toolasprashad
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and Walter M. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Martinez v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv00838
Petitioner:
Miguel M. Garcia-Martinez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Walter M. Ingram, Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hook v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv03466
Defendant:
Steve Durio, F.N.U. Martin, F.N.U. Sipe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark David Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01341
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01285
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Gao v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv00171
Petitioner:
Xiang Le Gao
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Todd Tryon and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
