Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Event Services, Freeman and others
Respondent:
Encore Productions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 4:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Event Services, Freeman Comapanies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Still et al v. Freeman et al
as 4:2020cv00308
Plaintiff:
I.T., Kimberly R Theison Still, D.T. and others
Defendant:
State of Iowa, M. Freeman, P. Galns and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Romeo Hardin
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Sheryl Dahm, Nick Ludwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Freeman
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon Health Nursing Staff and Polk County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. USA
as 1:2016cv00032
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Ramon Cortez Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00165
Petitioner:
Earl William Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. Chiprez et al
as 4:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Earl William Freeman
Defendant:
Chris Chiprez , Kevin Glendening , Des Moines County Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landis v. Freeman et al
as 4:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Steven Matthew Landis
Defendant:
Aaron Freeman and Steve Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Freeman et al
as 4:2009cv00404
Defendant:
Timothy Scott Freeman, George Sauers, Ronda Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
