Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Blazejowski v. France et al
as 3:2016cv01374
Plaintiff:
Tawny Blazejowski, Kayla Blazejowski, Paul Blazejowski, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Chris France, David Tarbert, Michael Traynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blazejowski v. France et al
as 3:2016cv01267
Petitioner:
Tawny Blazejowski
Respondent:
Chris France, Michael Traynor, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frances v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv01347
Petitioner:
David Sylvester Frances
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jacobson v. Wellington Medstat et al
as 9:2014cv80045
Plaintiff:
Neal M. Jacobson
Defendant:
Wellington Medstat and Frances Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldwire v. Castor et al
as 0:2012cv61330
Plaintiff:
France Goldwire
Defendant:
Frank Castor and Al Lamberti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens et al v. The State of Florida et al
as 1:2012cv20027
Plaintiff:
E-Yage Bowens
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, The State of Florida, The City of Miami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanier v. Ryan et al
as 1:2011cv22550
Plaintiff:
Gus Lanier
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan, Barbara Jordan, Alina T. Hudak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sneed v. Wisemer et al
as 3:2010cv00907
Plaintiff:
Luther Birl Sneed, Jr
Defendant:
J. Wisemer, Kenneth Thompson, Cornelius E Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROOK v. ABBOTT
as 4:2009cv00430
Plaintiff:
RONNY H CROOK
Defendant:
MARY FRANCES ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbur v. Larizza et al
as 3:2009cv01083
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilbur
Defendant:
Ralph J. Larizza, Mose Levon Floyd, Christina Opshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
