Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Russell v. Sabatka-Rine et al
as 4:2011cv03036
Defendant:
Douglas Diltz, James Dunn, George Green and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ronald Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanko v. USA
as 8:2010cv00432
Petitioner:
Rudolph George Stanko
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barber v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2010cv00167
Defendant:
N. Baker, George Green, Matt Heckman and others
Plaintiff:
LaVertice Barber
Warden:
Fred Britten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKoy v. Fahey et al
as 8:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sterling McKoy
Defendant:
Mike Fahey, Hal Daub, Omaha, City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Calderon v. Nebraska, State of et al
as 4:2008cv03039
Plaintiff:
Raul Calderon
Defendant:
Nebraska, State of, Joseph D. Nisro, Paul D. Merritt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Calderon v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv03022
Plaintiff:
Raul I. Calderon
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Nancy Pelasi, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanko v. USA
as 8:2008cv00053
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rudolph George Stanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. USA
as 8:2007cv00335
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
George W. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tyler v. Green et al
as 8:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Billy Roy Tyler
Defendant:
George Green, Randy Crosby, Unknown Krantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Newton et al
as 8:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
George R. Combs
Defendant:
Unknown Newton, Unknown Hubard, Unknown Maldonodo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
