Cases 11 - 20 of 608
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01457
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo et al v. Deglandon et al
as 9:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Perez Trujilo and Jacinto De La Garza Valdez
Defendant:
Cody Deglandon, Thomas Austin, Danna Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mirelez v. Llano County, TX et al
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Adam Mirelez
Defendant:
Llano County, TX, Llano County Sheriff's Department, Williamson County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv02310
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Martinez, Homosexual Vaughn, Prupertyrn Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. The United States of America
as 4:2023cv03380
Petitioner:
Richard Garza
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garza v. Dr. U Ughwanogho
as 4:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
Arturo Garza
Defendant:
Dr. U Ughwanogho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garza v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv03540
Petitioner:
Richard Garza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garza v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00481
Petitioner:
Thomas Jeffrey Garza
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
