Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Gibson v. Ludwig et al
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gibson
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Ludwig, John Doe, Kelly Riehle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. USA
as 5:2022cv01207
Petitioner:
Donte L. Gibson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00173
Petitioner:
Richard J. Gibson
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Cool et al
as 2:2021cv05146
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
William Cool, Travis Raypool, Dane Osbourne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Bey v. Wisecup et al
as 1:2021cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jttonali El Bey
Defendant:
Homer Wisecup, Joshua A. Gibson, Sarah J Avey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Champlin et al
as 2:2021cv04588
Plaintiff:
Admin Cara Gibson and Cara Gibson
Defendant:
Matt Champlin, Kevin T. Werry, Chief Deputy Troy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Stark County et al
as 5:2021cv01179
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gibson
Defendant:
Stark County and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Lt. Buchanan, City of Cincinnati, Lt. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
