Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Gonzalez v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2019cv00076
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Saul Gonzalez
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00321
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gonzalez
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Schierbrock et al
as 4:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Wayne Butts
Defendant:
Mike Schierbrock and Rodolfo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez Alcalde v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00514
Petitioner:
Gema Consuelo Gonzalez Alcalde
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00458
Petitioner:
Cesar Alexis Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00283
Petitioner:
Rachel Esmeralda Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv04076
Petitioner:
Geovany Gonzalez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00215
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Hernandez Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez v. Muscatine County Jail et al
as 4:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Cesar Alexis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Muscatine County Jail, Muscatine County Sheriff's Department and Muscatine County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Martinez v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00095
Petitioner:
Hugo Gonzalez-Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
