Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ROOD v. BRADLEY
as 3:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ERNEST ROOD, JR
Defendant:
ALFRED PAT BRADLEY, IV, JAMES GORE and BRIDGET MORISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gore v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv23284
Plaintiff:
Stephen Barrymore Gore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00850
Petitioner:
Donald Craig Gore
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00561
Petitioner:
Donald Craig Gore
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bury v. McNeil et al
as 2:2009cv14217
Plaintiff:
Robert Bury
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Pilar Tournay, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmunds v. Downs et al
as 1:2009cv20817
Plaintiff:
Russell Gore Edmunds
Defendant:
Robert Downs and Prisoner Transport Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gore v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv22637
Plaintiff:
David Alan Gore and David Alan Gore
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUINLAN v. CITY OF PENSACOLA et al
as 3:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PATRICK QUINLAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA, JOHN MATHIS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
