Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Grant v. USA - 2255
as 1:2014cv01846
Petitioner:
Leon Palmer Grant
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. State of Maryland
as 1:2014cv01406
Petitioner:
Cornelius Grant Williams
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant v. Morgan et al
as 8:2013cv02322
Petitioner:
Ronald Edward Grant
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Rumgay et al
as 1:2013cv01402
Plaintiff:
Torrey Lamont Love
Defendant:
William A. Rumgay, Todd Pressman, Pennie Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Harris
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Fredrica Grant, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeill v. Baltimore County Police Department et al
as 8:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Bobbie McNeill
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Department, Officier Weaver, Duker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Juknlis et al
as 1:2009cv01843
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Peter M. Juknlis, K. Dorsey, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Juknelis et al
as 1:2009cv01781
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Peter M. Juknelis, K. Dorsey, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Alessandro v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael R. D'Alessandro
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland, Suzyk Malagary, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
