Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Eaves v. Skramsted et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Skramsted, Vanessa Carson, Kory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. El Paso County et al
as 1:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
Darlene Griffith
Defendant:
El Paso County, Wellpath and Royball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baumann v. Willams et al
as 1:2022cv02116
Plaintiff:
Gary Baumann, Jr
Defendant:
Dean Willams, Barry Goodrich, Christinan Cappellucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo v. Colorado Inmate Bank et al
as 1:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Colorado Inmate Bank, C. Alloy, Tonya Whitney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Berg et al
as 1:2021cv03181
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Berg, Gomez, Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Warden Terry Jaques, Travis Marler, carolyn hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2021cv02714
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Eugene Owens
Defendant:
Siobhan Burtlow, Joshua Lessar, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarver v. Williams
as 1:2021cv02149
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Scarver
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Anthony A. DeCesaro, Marshall Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Elder et al
as 1:2021cv01756
Defendant:
Cy Gillespie and Bill Elder
Plaintiff:
Darlene Griffith
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/ INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Darlene Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
