Cases 11 - 20 of 238
MACINTOSH v. ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv09889
Defendant:
NJ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTORS OFFICE, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
GENO L. MACINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv15388
Defendant:
CHRISTINE BLAISE HAMILTON, ESQ. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMILTON v. DOLCE et al
as 3:2018cv02615
Plaintiff:
ABDUS SAMAD HAMILTON
Defendant:
RALPH DOLCE, STEPHEN D'ILIO, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAMBINO v. AHSA CASSANO et al
as 1:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant:
AHSA CASSANO, DR. IBA, RN WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMILTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08737
Plaintiff:
DAHEEM HAMILTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07555
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALTON HAMILTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv05912
Plaintiff:
CHARINE K. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv05705
Petitioner:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMILTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv05503
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HAMILTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS, DAVID OWENS and nefsgf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
