Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Hunt v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03030
Petitioner:
Tavaris E Hunt
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Kocher et al
as 2:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Amber Kocher, . Studniarz, P Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Cox et al
as 3:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
. Cox, Tiona Farrington, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv03120
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Tiona Farrington, Unknown Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Essex et al v. Knox County Sheriffs Department et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Essex, JaJuan Hunt, Anthony Cheeks and others
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriffs Department, Louis Glossip, Brad Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Glossip et al
as 4:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
JaJuan Hunt
Defendant:
Louis Glossip, Brad Abernathy and Jose Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Brown, et al
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hunt
Defendant:
Chicago Police District 7th, John Doe and David Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Heuerman
as 2:2022cv02045
Petitioner:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Respondent:
Dustin D Heuerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
