Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hamilton v. Adams County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Charles Leavell Hamilton
Defendant:
Adams County, Mississippi, Adams County Sheriff's Office, Travis Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. McGee et al
as 2:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ke'Jorium Diontae McKnight
Defendant:
Billy McGee, Brandon Darniel, Unknown Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Alvin Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Sharon Hamilton, E. L. Sparkman and MDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Holman et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Petitioner:
Willie Hamilton
Respondent:
James Holman and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Patterson
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors, Dr. Griffin, Dr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransburgh v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2008cv00605
Plaintiff:
Lewis Ransburgh, Sr.
Defendant:
Glenn Hamilton, Tina Thompson, Shely Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ransburgh v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2007cv00737
Plaintiff:
Lewis Ransburgh, Sr.
Defendant:
Glenn Hamilton, Tina Thompson and Shely Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2007cv00728
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Glenn Hamilton, Shannon Warmack, Walter Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuselier v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2007cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Fuselier
Defendant:
Glenn Hamilton, Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randle v. Mississippi State Parole Board et al
as 3:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Mississippi State Parole Board and Glenn Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
