Cases 11 - 20 of 116
HARRISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS HARRISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY JEFFERSON, AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. CHAMBERS et al
as 5:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LANE
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PASHION CHAMBERS, AUDRA HARRISON, DOCTOR ENI NWABUEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Whittle
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Timothy Vaughn, Kelli Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. PARIKH
as 6:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT HARRISON, JR
Defendant:
JYOLI PARIKH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. PARIKH
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT HARRISON, JR
Defendant:
JYOLI PARIKH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARL ASHLEY THOMPSON
Defendant:
COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL, Sheriff ROD HOWELL, Capt JULIUS COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. BALL et al
as 5:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
TAVARES DOUGLAS HARRIS
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER GEORGE BALL, CO II WILLIE GAINES, CO II HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWART v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JULIUS COWART
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Captain JASON CLIFTON, Staff Sergeant SWAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
