Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Campbell v. Britten
as 4:2013cv03102
Respondent:
Fred Britten
Petitioner:
Herbert L. Campbell
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Britten
as 4:2012cv03257
Defendant:
Fred Britten
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2012cv03174
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Nelson
as 4:2012cv03057
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Defendant:
Jodi L. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Kirkland et al
as 4:2012cv03016
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, Brenda J. Council, Robert P. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Kopf
as 4:2011cv03178
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Defendant:
Richard G. Kopf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2011cv03159
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Defendant:
Lincoln Journal Star News Paper Co, Nebraska State Correctional Department and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Bakewell
as 8:2009cv00252
Petitioner:
Herbert L. Campbell
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Houston et al
as 4:2008cv03092
Petitioner:
Herbert L. Campbell
Respondent:
Bob Houston and Unknown Bakewell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
