Cases 11 - 20 of 155
Bryant Jr. v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv05477
Plaintiff:
Ollie L. Bryant Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, Ronald Broomfield, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Allison et al
as 5:2022cv04522
Plaintiff:
Rhone Watson
Defendant:
CDCR, CCHCS, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ari v. Houston
as 3:2022cv02515
Petitioner:
Roxanne Atka Ari
Respondent:
Mona Houston, John Doe, Gail Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky T. Russell v. Nathan Townsend et al
as 5:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Ricky T. Russell
Defendant:
Nathan Townsend, M. Houston, Morris, -- and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv02475
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Houston
Defendant:
S. Gutierrez, M. Rangel and L Maciel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston Michael Boji v. Heather Shirley
as 2:2022cv02410
Petitioner:
Houston Michael Boji
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston Michael Boji v. Heather Shirley
as 5:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Houston Michael Boji
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris D. Houston v. Torres et al
as 2:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
Morris D Houston
Defendant:
Robert Torres, Beltran, Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Houston
Defendant:
S. Gutierrez, L Maciel and M. Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melinda K. Thomas v. Mona Houston
as 5:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Melinda K Thomas
Respondent:
Mona Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
