Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Cisco v. Rumley et al
as 2:2021cv02176
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
David Rumley, Illinois State Police, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tottleben v. Illinois State Police Officer
as 3:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Tottleben
Defendant:
Illinois State Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2020cv05288
Defendant:
Illinois State Police
Plaintiff:
Detrice R. Fair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lacy et al
as 2:2020cv02128
Defendant:
Dennis Gardner, Danville Police Department, Illinois State Police and others
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unassigned
as 1:2019cv06985
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr. and Unassigned
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Circuit Court of Rock Island County et al
as 1:2019cv04357
Plaintiff:
Santrell R Miller
Defendant:
Circuit Court Of Cook County, Illinois State Police and Circuit Court of Rock Island County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv03019
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., J. Starkey, D. Davenport and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Whitfield, Lavell Thornton and Jodeci Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2019cv01136
Defendant:
B Johnson, Jeff Enderli, J Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Durell Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Flack et al
as 3:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamont Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Flack, City of Effingham, Illinois State Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Flack et al
as 1:2019cv01051
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamont Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Flack, City of Effingham, Illinois State Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
