Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01152
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stone v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone
Respondent:
Jimmy S. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schubert v. Mnuchin et al
as 1:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
Steven Mnuchin and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miranda v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Domingo Miranda
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2022cv02726
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Thompson
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rundles v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2022cv02728
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Rundles
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Lincoln Heritage Insurance Company, TDCJ Director Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reese v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kenneth Reese
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
