Cases 11 - 20 of 509
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cormia v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Dolwin D. Cormia
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Pegues
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Derwin Valentino Thomas
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
