Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Morris v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Lonnie R. Townsend, LaMorris Marshall, Douglas Foust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Baugh et al
as 9:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Michael Angel Gonzales
Defendant:
Korie Baugh, Christopher A. Farrell, Kurtis D. Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Director of TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2022cv01718
Plaintiff:
Kourton Williams
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ-CID, Michael Butcher, Unit Grievance Coordinator - Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Baugh et al
as 9:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael A Gonzalez
Defendant:
Korie A Baugh, Christopher A Farrell, Penelope Dorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Cipriano Vargas
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, G Petry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parmeley v. Titus County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Captain Price, John P. Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Driver for PTS Jane Doe #2, Alan Sielbeck, Driver for PTS Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Demond T. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro v. Wallace et al
as 6:2020cv01116
Defendant:
Warden Darren Wallace, Assistant Warden Toby Powell, Assistant Warden Chundi Akwiti and others
Plaintiff:
Hubert Edward Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grizzle v. Coffman et al
as 9:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Mervin Cleveland, Martha Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
