Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Thomas v. Greystone Psychiatric Hospital
as 8:2013cv02167
Petitioner:
Jay L. Thomas
Respondent:
Greystone Psychiatric Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. U.S. Department of Education
as 8:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
Jay Thomas
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01376
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Britton v. Warden
as 8:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Jay Britton , Jr.
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harding, Sr. et al v. Garrett County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jay R. Harding, Sr. and Andrew W Shrock
Defendant:
Garrett County Detention Center, Jim Shreve, Jim Tichnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hustead v. USA - 2255
as 1:2012cv03618
Petitioner:
Jay W. Hustead
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harding, Sr. v. Corley et al
as 1:2012cv03388
Plaintiff:
Jay R. Harding, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Corley, Garrett County Detention Center and Terri Shlosnaggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harding v. Conmed Healthcare Managment Inc.
as 1:2012cv03249
Plaintiff:
Jay R. Harding, Sr.
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Managment Inc., Paul Daniel Miller, Donna Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingram v. Harbough et al
as 1:2010cv03610
Defendant:
Jay Harbough and J. Gibbner
Plaintiff:
Monte A. Ingram, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
