Cases 11 - 20 of 460
Safran v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01519
Petitioner:
David Jeffrey Safran
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saeli v. Price et al
as 6:2023cv06661
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
Dave Price, Village of Fredonia NY, Brad Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro-Almonte v. Searls
as 1:2023cv01160
Petitioner:
Luis D. Castro-Almonte
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bush v. USA
as 1:2023cv08217
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bush
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coleman et al v. County of Oneida et al
as 9:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Beau M. Coleman, Antolvio Ayuso, Jeffrey Nagle and others
Defendant:
County of Oneida, Oneida County Jail, Oneida County Sheriffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nkarakwi v. Searls
as 6:2023cv06456
Petitioner:
Rodriech Nkarakwi
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv06657
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Detective Jeffrey Carroll, Police Officer Frank Feliciano, Narcotics Det. 25th John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henries v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
Edward Henries
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv05491
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Jeffrey Carroll, Frank Feliciano, John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
