Cases 11 - 20 of 377
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00444
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Jamel Mitchell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCray-El v. O'Boyle et al
as 7:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Eric McCray-El
Defendant:
Patricia O'Boyle, K. Paderick, Jeffrey C. Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Napier v. Ohai et al
as 7:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Walter Randolph Napier, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul C. Ohai, MD, A. David Robinson, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavalieri v. Boyers et al
as 7:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
David Edward Cavalieri
Defendant:
Ms. C. Shanks, A. David Robinson, Stacy Meinhard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Ofc. Gilbert, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Ellis et al
as 1:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
T. E. Ellis, James C. Clark, Ryan Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Spears
as 7:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
John Jeffrey Woods
Defendant:
Jerry Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
