Cases 11 - 20 of 2,037
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Pegues
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
