Cases 11 - 20 of 4,973
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
as 7:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat v. Creuzot
as 3:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
John Creuzot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Law Library et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
Law Library and Unknown Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 9:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Kate Willis, John Kinnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
