Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MARCUS v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 2:2012cv01772
Plaintiff:
MOREY MARCUS
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPPARD v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2011cv02398
Plaintiff:
AARON SHEPPARD
Defendant:
JEFFREY ZAVIS , JOHN DOE (A-Z), JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE (1-2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANDT v. HOGAN et al
as 3:2010cv04944
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HOGAN, PATRICIA FOUNDAS, BENITO MARTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGEACHY v. JOHN DOE #1 WARDEN COVER et al
as 2:2010cv03342
Plaintiff:
TIM MCGREADY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 WARDEN COVER, LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER(County Jail), JOHN DOE # 2 HUDSON COUNTY SHERRIF DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOFFMAN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DEVON BROWN, GEORGE W. HAYMAN, LYDELL SHERRER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. BRANDT et al
as 3:2009cv05367
Defendant:
JOHN BRANDT, TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, LAWRENCE ROSSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. UNION COUNTY COUNSEL et al
as 2:2008cv05354
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY JAIL WARDEN - 2006, G. STEWART and UNION COUNTY JAIL ALL JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BARBER v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2008cv04936
Plaintiff:
JAMANE BARBER
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and DR. JOHN DOE, DR . JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. DE PROSPO, #4483 et al
as 2:2008cv01813
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY DE PROSPO, #4483, MIGUEL A. CRUZ, #4522, L. TORRES, #4537 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARRIS v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2007cv05475
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHN S. CORZINE, ANNE MILGRAM, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
