Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Gage v. Newton et al
as 5:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Denton W Gage
Defendant:
FNU Newton, Alger Flood, Jodi K Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrell v. Breidenstein et al
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Farrell
Defendant:
FNU Breidenstein, FNU Ferrell, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Tulsa County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hall and Christopher K Hall
Defendant:
Tulsa County Jail, Summit Food Service and Chaplain Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castleman v. Marler et al
as 6:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Castleman
Defendant:
Dr Marler, Donna K. Arnold, Regina VanBlaircom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarclay v. Averitt et al
as 5:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manquan Yarclay
Defendant:
L Averitt, Dr L Averitt, Ms K Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mayes v. Dowling et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and K Nikki Kirpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zerie v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
Uqbasilassie K Zerie
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Head v. Zook
as 5:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Charles Head
Respondent:
K Zook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jean E Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Nathan K Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Betty Guffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
