Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Adkins v. Elam et al
as 0:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Carl Adkins
Defendant:
Roger K. Elam, James D. Green and Jimmy Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sublett v. Pucket et al
as 5:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Damien A. Sublett
Defendant:
Joyce Pucket, Dr. K. Smith, L. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morel v. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jordan v. Hughes et al
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Jordan and Austin Jordan
Defendant:
K. Hughes, Officer Farmer and Fayette County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morel v. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kliessendorff v. Roederer Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2021cv00526
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Kliessendorff
Defendant:
Roederer Correctional Complex, Jessica Ferguson, Jay Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holder v. Caldwell et al
as 5:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
King Patrick Warren Holder
Defendant:
Judge Karen K. Caldwell, J. Gregory Wehrrman, Pamela S. Ledgewood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Al Kini v. Ferguson
as 3:2021cv00486
Petitioner:
Ismaeel K. Al Kini
Respondent:
Jesse Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kiper v. Robey
as 3:2021cv00379
Petitioner:
Randall K. Kiper
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Buster et al
as 6:2021cv00098
Defendant:
K. Carson and T. Buster
Plaintiff:
Richard Patton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
