Cases 11 - 20 of 24
FORD v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04761
Defendant:
LPN MARKELLE POWELL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENTON A. FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05490
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2016cv03097
Plaintiff:
DONALD P. BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
TERENCE FARRELL, D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, MORGAN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINLEY v. MCFADDEN, ET AL. et al
as 2:2016cv01605
Plaintiff:
KEVIN VASHAUN MCKINLEY
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANGLAIS v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
LEWIS LANGLAIS
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC., KAREN MURPHY, J. HEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. (CHESTER COUNTY) MUNICIPLE et al
as 2:2015cv05609
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A RIVERA
Defendant:
(CHESTER COUNTY) MUNICIPLE, MARCONI, MATTHEW JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2012cv05673
Plaintiff:
BRUCE C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, RONALD PHILLIPS, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2012cv03356
Plaintiff:
HERBERT C. MCCLAIN
Defendant:
TERRENCE FARRELL, D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, PRIME CARE MEDICAL PROVIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMSEL v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2012cv03244
Plaintiff:
RYAN SAMSEL
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BYRON VANN, JR
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, KAREN MURPHY, PRIMECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
