Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryl Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christmas v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Demond Christmas
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzer, Iris Y. Martinez, Brendan F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Childs v. Kwame Raoul
as 23-3281
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN CHILDS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden and KWAME RAOUL
Klespitz v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv03315
Petitioner:
Kayden Klespitz
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sherman v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherman
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv03306
Petitioner:
Troy Woods
Respondent:
Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crutcher v. Kettlekamp
as 3:2023cv03308
Petitioner:
David Crutcher
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul and Sheriff Bruce Kettlekamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goins v. Kettlekamp
as 3:2023cv03310
Petitioner:
Georg Goins
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul and Sheriff Bruce Kettlekamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv14204
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Kim Foxx, Michael Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
