Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Lopez v. Yates, et al.
as 1:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Emiliano Lopez
Defendant:
James A. Yates, L. Mackin, L. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Andre L. Wilson v. State of California
as 2:2010cv03253
Respondent:
State of California
Petitioner:
Andre L. Wilson
Gonzalez v. Adams et al
as 1:2009cv01284
Petitioner:
Everett Galindo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, C. Gardemal, L. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Uribe
as 3:2009cv00633
Petitioner:
Stephen L Wilson
Respondent:
D Uribe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Walker et al
as 2:2008cv00419
Petitioner:
Titus L. Wilson
Respondent:
J. Walker and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2007cv01821
Plaintiff:
Lonzell Green
Defendant:
A. Hedgpeth, Mike Morales and David L. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2007cv01703
Petitioner:
Thomas L Wilson
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2007cv02294
Petitioner:
Thomas L Wilson
Respondent:
CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Attorney General for State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Jabels et al
as 2:2007cv01343
Plaintiff:
Lonzell Green
Defendant:
Edward R. Jabels, David L Wilson, Thomas D. Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
