Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Murray v. Head of Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Head of Department of Human Services, Lane County Department of Human Services, State of Orgon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Shugan et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Kamala H Shugar, Lane County DAs Office, Erick T. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T Knapp, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T. Knapp, Lane Count DAs Office, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. DA's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T Knapp, Lane County DAs Office and Springfield PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County DA's Office
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. WellPath et al
as 6:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Page
Defendant:
WellPath, Nurse Brittani Standing, HSA Maegan Quillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
