Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Shaw v. Smith et al
as 6:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Abdul H. Shaw
Defendant:
Dawn M. Smith, Erin Jones, Stautbrenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard vs Thaler etal
as 9:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Richard
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Brad Livingston, Oliver J. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Scurry Co. Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 5:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Travis M Smith
Defendant:
Scurry Co. Sheriff's Dept., Delwyn Davis and Darren Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero v. King Jr et al
as 9:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ruben Guerrero
Defendant:
Wade A King Jr, Jan M Smith, Craig A Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Oliver et al
as 9:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Leslie Morgan
Defendant:
Gregory Oliver, Benjey B Ferguson, Jay A North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv00743
Petitioner:
Lafiel M Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Texas Tech University et al
as 2:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M Smith
Defendant:
Texas Tech University, S Reilly, Timothy Revell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Addicks v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Addicks, Jr
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Doug Dretke, R Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00561
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Joseph M Smith, Saterria M Anderson, Doris H Cruse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Freeman et al
as 1:2007cv00563
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Wesley E Freeman, Joseph M Smith, Timothy Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
