Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Greene v. Warden et al
as 4:2019cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael Greene
Respondent:
Warden and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Green et al
as 3:2016cv01168
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
Michael Green, James Ellis, Cindy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Tice et al
as 3:2016cv00900
Petitioner:
Michael Greene
Respondent:
Tice and PA State Attorney General
Defendant:
PA Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christian v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
Cindy S. Johnson, James Ellis, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Potteiger et al
as 1:2014cv02323
Petitioner:
Vincent Thomas
Respondent:
Michael Potteiger, Randy Feather, James C. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VENERI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04546
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, GREGORY M. MALLON and G. MICHAEL GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AGUIAR v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv05266
Plaintiff:
JASON J. AGUIAR
Defendant:
MICHAEL THOMPSON , BRETT WEAVER , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. WHITE et al
as 2:2012cv03860
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. WOOD, IV
Defendant:
CARROLE WHITE, MICHAEL GREENE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
