Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Oseni v. Mahoney
as 1:2016cv08743
Petitioner:
Kayode Oseni
Respondent:
William S. Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DePalma v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2016cv01196
Plaintiff:
John DePalma
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Justice Center, Doctor Kori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Saint Louis et al
as 9:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mattison
Defendant:
Saint Louis, Mahoney, C. Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Cerious McCray and Kimberly Casanova
Defendant:
New York State, State Commission of Correction (SCOC), Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mahoney
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Dept., Woodhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler-Gibson v. The New York Division of Parole et al
as 1:2012cv05051
Plaintiff:
Jesse Shuler-Gibson
Defendant:
The New York Division of Parole, Pittman and William Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2010cv03273
Plaintiff:
Kim Carl
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers, Brian McCormack, Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pritchard et al
as 1:2008cv09587
Plaintiff:
Warren Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Pritchard, Jean, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conklin v. Mahoney et al
as 1:2008cv04557
Plaintiff:
Joshua Conklin
Defendant:
Kyle Mahoney, Nelson, Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odom v. Stevens et al
as 1:2007cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Odom
Defendant:
Donald Stevens, Timothy Lewalski, Gerald Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
