Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Nickerson v. Logan County Detention Center
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Matthew Andrew Nickerson
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkman v. Mason County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Kirkman
Defendant:
Mason County Detention Center and Gerald Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. USA
as 5:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Katherine E. Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kirkman v. Mason County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Kirkman
Defendant:
Mason County Detention Center and Lt. Gerald Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Patton
Defendant:
Donald Miller and David Heacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otterson v. Richards
as 1:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Derek Matthew Otterson
Defendant:
Jamie Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00634
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Pace v. Graves et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pace
Defendant:
Mandy Graves, Matthew Quimby, Dr. Shawnie Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worley v. Graves et al
as 5:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ashley Worley
Defendant:
Mandy Graves, Matthew Quimby and Jenny Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cecil Franklin
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark and Greg Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
