Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Giddings v. Commissioner of MD Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Commissioner of MD Prisons, MCTC Warden, Inmate #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Matthew Blair
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giddings v. Montgomery County et al
as 1:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Montgomery County Prosecuters, Charles County Probation Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weber et al
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Floyd Glenn Williams
Defendant:
Warden R. S. Weber, Dr. Matthew Alaway, Dr. Jason Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Obello et al
as 1:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Michael Simms
Defendant:
Fredderick Obello, Ofc. Mike Matthew, Coirzon Healthcare Team Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tinker v. Eastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Lahvon Lee Tinker
Defendant:
Eastern Correctional Institution, Warden Walter West, Captain Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Giddings v. M.C.T.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03189
Petitioner:
Warren Matthew Gidddings and Warren Mathew Giddings
Respondent:
M.C.T.C., Maryland Attorney General and Denise A. Gelsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giddings v. Corizon et al
as 1:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Corizon, Mr. Rory and Mr. Rorher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Giddings v. Green et al
as 1:2021cv02850
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Nurse Green and CO Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
