Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Scott v. Paisley et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Terry Boyd, Lewis Matthews and Kalah Paisley
Plaintiff:
Luke John Scott, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tsosie v. City of Billings et al
as 1:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Matthew Frank, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Tsosie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Terrance Johnson, Sgt. Graham and Montana Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holguin v. Cascade County et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew Holguin, Jr.
Defendant:
Cascade County, Cascade County Sheriff's Office, Bob Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thum v. Attorney General of the State of Montana
as 1:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
Scott Matthew Thum
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thibert v. Page et al
as 4:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Thibert
Defendant:
Robert N. Page and Cascade County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Stichman et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Griffin
Defendant:
Sheila Stichman, Amanda Roos and Russ Ostwalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Warden Green et al
as 9:2016cv00132
Petitioner:
Matthew Lynn Montgomery
Respondent:
Warden Green and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Converse v. Kohut et al
as 6:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Converse
Defendant:
Tristan Kohut, Gerald Henderson, G Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew v. Yellowstone County et al
as 1:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
David James Matthew
Defendant:
Yellowstone County, Yellowstone County Sheriff, US Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
