Cases 11 - 20 of 38
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 1:2019cv05653
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Secretary Mark S. Inch, State of Florida, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 6:2019cv06689
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Ashley Moody and Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 1:2019cv08598
Defendant:
State of Florida, Mark Inch and Ashley Moody
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv07185
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones, Pam Bondi and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chrichlow v. Commissioner of the New York State D.O.C.S. et al
as 1:2018cv03222
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Chrichlow
Defendant:
Commissioner of the New York State D.O.C.S., William F. Keyser, Jr., M. Makowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv01634
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 9:2018cv00186
Defendant:
Alan Herdzik, C.O. Simmons, Stephen Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv09564
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. Suffolk County Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv05904
Defendant:
Brookhaven Memorial Hospital, Detective John Doe, Doctor Liam Lam and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin J. Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Prack et al
as 6:2017cv06427
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
A. Prack, J. Lempke, T. Stricht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
