Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Michael Knuth v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 18-1771
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL KNUTH
Defendant - Appellee: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MICHAEL LEMKE, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Donelson v. Pfister et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01117
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Randy Pfister, Donald Gish, Angelica Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Generally v. Godinez et al
as 1:2018cv01073
Plaintiff: Nigel Generally
Defendant: Salvador Godinez, David Gomez, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. Godinez et al
as 1:2018cv01075
Plaintiff: Contrell Plummer
Defendant: Salvador Godinez, David Gomez, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis v. Phister et al
as 1:2017cv08574
Plaintiff: Montez Artis
Defendant: Randy Phister, Tarry Williams, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Walker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2821
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., SALEH OBAISI, Doctor and MICHAEL LEMKE, Warden
Holly v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv04501
Defendant: Assistant Warden Edwards, Marcus Hardy, Michael Lemke and others
Plaintiff: David Darnell Holly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Lemke v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20352
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH MICHAEL LEMKE
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Generally v. Godinez et al
as 1:2017cv02694
Plaintiff: Nigel Generally
Defendant: Salvidor Godinez, David Gomez, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deering v. Studer et al
as 1:2017cv02360
Plaintiff: Lavelle Deering
Defendant: Michael Studer, Quinten Tanner, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?