Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Murphy v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Murphy
Defendant:
Major Bobby Lumpkin, Assistant Chairman Kelly Strong, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Ryan Albert Murphy
Defendant:
Jared Robinson, Mark Stevens, Dr. FNU Gallagow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01170
Defendant:
Jedidiah Murphy, Mr. Alexander Jones and Mr. Ali Nasser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Warden, Mark W. Stiles Unit
as 1:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Otheaner Deon Murphy
Defendant:
Warden, Mark W. Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murphy v. Coleman-Clanton
as 6:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brian Murphy
Defendant:
Major Brenda J Coleman-Clanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02888
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02805
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Durham et al
as 4:2023cv02638
Plaintiff:
John Eldridge Murphy
Defendant:
William Durham, Hal Ridley, Chris Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
