Cases 11 - 20 of 172
Parker v. Gregory et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephon Parker
Defendant:
Unknown, Alisa Gregory, Dr. James Cane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Boyd, et al.
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Jeffry W. Parker, Rosemary V. Bourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. U.S Marshals Service Eastern District of Virginia
as 1:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
U.S Marshals Service Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Parker
as 7:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Wayne Sanders
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail and Officer Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
John Edward Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gabe Morgan, Sr., Cencere and Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Parker
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Michael Odom Smith
Defendant:
Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Garfield Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
John Edward Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
V Garfield Allen, R Daniels, Mayham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Smith v. Parker
as 7:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Odom Smith
Defendant:
Chief Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
John Edward Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Brian Moran and Tonya D. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
