Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Freeman v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00397
Plaintiff:
Berwin B. Freeman, Sr.
Defendant:
Core Civic, Blair Leiback, James Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01136
Petitioner:
Kevin Bernard Pearson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pearson v. Core Civic
as 3:2017cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pearson
Defendant:
Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. CCA et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pearson
Defendant:
CCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Westbrooks
as 3:2016cv03018
Petitioner:
Marcus Pearson
Respondent:
Bruce Westbrooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Graves et al
as 4:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ricardo McDonald
Defendant:
Steve Graves, Quality Corrections Healthcare, Valeria Uselton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Graves et al
as 3:2015cv01440
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ricardo McDonald
Defendant:
Steve Graves, Quality Corrections Healthcare, Valeria Uselton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Rashunus Pearson
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office, CCS Medical Staff and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glass et al v. All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff et al
as 4:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Keyvin Glass, Paul Fletcher and Maurice Walker
Defendant:
All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff, State of TN, f/n/u Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glass et al v. All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff et al
as 3:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Keyvin Glass, Paul Fletcher and Maurice Walker
Defendant:
All Coffee County Deputies, Sheriffs, and Correctional Staff, Tennessee, State of, f/n/u Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
