Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Black v. May et al
as 2:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Black
Defendant:
Ronnie May, Anthony Pace, Mike Briley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. May et al
as 3:2011cv01480
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Newman
Defendant:
Ronnie May, Colbert County Jail, Colbert County Sherifff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv01189
Petitioner:
Ricky Walter Denton
Respondent:
Anthony Pace and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fisher v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00787
Plaintiff:
Charles C Fisher
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mays and Nancy Hearn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
Jerry Stout
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mayes and Nancy Hearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chasteen v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00784
Plaintiff:
James Chasteen
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mays and Nancy Hearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
Patrick Scruggs
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mays and Nancy Hearn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pounder v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Randy J Pounder
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mayes and Nancy Hearn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bass v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00788
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bass
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mays and Nancy Hearn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denton v. Pace et al
as 3:2010cv00734
Plaintiff:
Ricky Walter Denton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Anthony Pace, Ronnie Mayes and Nancy Hearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
