Cases 11 - 17 of 17
(PC) Williams v. Jones et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv01595
Defendant:
G. Jones and Parham
Plaintiff:
Tyson Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Plunkett v. Parham et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv01450
Defendant:
S. Davis, C. Parham and R. Andrade
Plaintiff:
Charles Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bishop Parham v. Ralph Diaz
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv06692
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Petitioner:
Robert Bishop Parham
Axtle et al v. County of Alameda et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2012cv06404
Plaintiff:
Ismael Eduardo Axtle, Mario Ochoa Gonzalez and Anthony McGee
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Greg Ahern, Carla Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Bishop Parham v. Mike McDonald
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2011cv08479
Respondent:
Mike McDonald
Petitioner:
Robert Bishop Parham
Parham v. Benov
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv00365
Petitioner:
Christopher Parham
Respondent:
Michael L. Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.