Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Powell v. N.Y. State Unified Court System et al
as 2:2022cv07458
Plaintiff:
Mr. Terence C. Powell
Defendant:
N.Y. State Unified Court System, Lab Corp, National Grid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mickles v. Powell et al
as 1:2022cv04781
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Patrice Powell, Kayla Hall, Brittan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03819
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, ADW Green, Captain Islam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinnis v. Orange County Jail et al
as 7:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Jermaine McGinnis
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, The Town of Walkhill Police Department, Orange County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Hallett et al
as 1:2021cv02808
Defendant:
Capt. Powell, Capt. Thompson, Capt. Libaud and others
Plaintiff:
Dorian Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv04172
Defendant:
The State of New York, The Department of Correction and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Woodworth et al
as 6:2020cv06377
Plaintiff:
Ainsworth Fritz-Roy Barnes
Defendant:
Ms. Regan, Mr. Thompson, Ms. K. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Flood et al
as 2:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Powell
Defendant:
N.C.C.J., Flood and Sherriff flood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell Bey v. Corso
as 1:2020cv00687
Plaintiff:
Darnel Powell Bey
Defendant:
Lisa Corso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Powell-Dickerson v. Bell
as 1:2019cv05062
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Petitioner:
Ragene Powell-Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
