Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Via v. Mathena
as 7:2012cv00117
Respondent:
R. C. Mathena
Petitioner:
Barry Lynn Via
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Mathena et al
as 7:2012cv00095
Defendant:
Mr. Ronnie Brock, Corizon Health Service, Inc, Ms. Kilgore and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndrell Demond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Respondent:
Harold Clark, John S. Garman, R. C. Mathena and others
Petitioner:
Deonta Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onwuka v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center et al
as 7:2011cv00485
Defendant:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. C. Mathena and Unknown Dog Handlers
Plaintiff:
John Onwuka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strebe v. Mathena et al
as 7:2011cv00469
Defendant:
T. Flanary, Lt. Kilbourne and R. C. Mathena
Plaintiff:
Brian David Strebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Totten v. Mathena
as 1:2011cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Totten
Defendant:
R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Mathena et al
as 7:2010cv00404
Defendant:
Mr. Baker, Central Classification; Name Unknown, Mr. Former and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Dooley et al
as 7:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Zachary Cooper, Sr.
Defendant:
Cordle, J. Dooley, J. Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mathena et al
as 7:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Clayton Brown
Defendant:
Warden R. C. Mathena, Officer Mitchell and Sgt. Shrieve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pietropinto v. Hedman et al
as 3:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
James W. Pietropinto
Defendant:
R. C. Hedman and J. A. Grazioso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
