Cases 11 - 20 of 290
Hartel v. WI Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Raymond Allan Hartel
Defendant:
WI Dept of Corrections, CO Wirenga, Scott Kinnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBrow, Eric v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Eric James DeBrow
Respondent:
Randall Hepp and WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson, John v. York et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Mann Anderson
Defendant:
Nurse York, Sgt. Ewert, LT Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Hepp et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Yana Posich, Tonnie Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01665
Petitioner:
Quordalis V Sanders
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Leppert v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
Michael R Leppert
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Kevin Carr and Tony Evers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Brushae Brown
Defendant:
Warden Randall Hepp, Emily Propson and Y Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
James M Brooks
Defendant:
Warden Randall Hepp, Emily Propson and Yana Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Waupun Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Henry L Watson, III
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution, Department of Corrections, Governor Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01458
Petitioner:
Richard M. Arrington
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
